GUILDFORD
LABOUR PARTY |
||||||
For
residents living outside the town |
||||||
![]() |
This page covers issues under the authority of Guildford Borough Council, Surrey County Council and will include topics in adjacent District Council area close to Guildford. | |||||
| Development at Dunsfold Airfield | ||||||
|
We are disappointed that this imaginative development was turned down on appeal. The argument that increased vehicle movements would be excessive for this rural area was the overriding consideration. If it had been approved then undoubtedly plans would have been developed to improve the local roads. The problems did not seem to be insurmountable. It was unlikely that the Minister would overturn the Planning Inspector's decision. The Inspector has made the detailed analysis and so reversal of the decision would only happen in very special cases. The fact that the proposed eco-town would have been one of the most advanced in Europe and the possibility of new public transport options arising during the fifteen years of the development have apparently carried no weight. |
||||||
|
Labour's
submissions to the Public Inquiry from |
||||||
| Local people have lost more than affordable housing. Previously inaccessible land would have become available for public leisure purposes and the planned restoration of the adjacent Wey & Arun canal with a new canal basin would have added to local leisure facilities | ||||||
|
Affordable housing Waverley Borough Council says it has affordable housing as one of its two top priorities. Yet it has fought against this scheme to provide 910 affordable homes out of 2600 in this proposal . Waverley's own figures given at the Public Inquiry, show there is a need for 622 affordable homes a year - after allowing for re-lets, and so on. When the cheapest housing in Waverley costs ten times the low end average wage a year, you can see why there is such a need. Its housing officer admitted at the Inquiry that only 80 affordable homes a year have been built over the last few years. And when asked if the council's plans would be better over the next few years, the answer was "No, they wouldn't". So Waverley has a gap of 542 affordable homes a year, no plans to do anything about this gap, and then turned down a scheme that offered 910 affordable homes. Waverley's Housing Officer would clearly like to do more, but the Conservative councillors of Waverley won't let him. They say that affordable housing is a top priority but refuse to do anything about it. |
||||||
|
Actions speak louder than words Both Ann Milton and Jeremy Hunt, our two local Conservative MPs have opposed the scheme and spoke against it at the public inquiry. Yet they also say they want more affordable homes! Obviously they don't want them anywhere near their most ardent supporters in the rural areas. They are both Shadow Ministers and therefore we can assume that they reflect the attitudes of the Shadow Cabinet on affordable housing. |
||||||
|
The future of Cranleigh hospital Action on a new hospital
and health centre is getting closer. NHS Surrey has been consulting the
public on the facilities required and there is some concern that the hospital
will not have beds, commissioning them when required in local nursing
homes..
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
| | Homepage | Contents List | Tim Shand | Labour Briefing | Labour in Surrey | Borough Issues | Renewable Energy | Recycling & Waste | East Guildford | Guildford Rural | Labour in Europe | Hunting with Dogs | Contact Us | Membership Information | ||||||
|
Promoted
and published by Guildford Labour Party P.O. Box 80 Guildford GU1 2BE. ©
Guildford Labour Party |
||||||